I do understand that these ideas are probably not true; however they are ideas that I feel I should write down otherwise i shall forget or lose my thoughts/ideas.
When we talk about our universe we always talk about it as 4
dimensional; with 3 dimensions of Space and 1 of Time.
But I have a problem with the term “time”;
You can measure the 3 dimensions of Space in a Singularity
of time; for example when time is not changing a 30cm ruler will continue being
30cm.
However to measure time we need the other dimensions.
Think about it; a stopwatch relies on movement. Any way of
measuring time relies on the other 3 dimensions.
This has led me to believe whether time is only really
relevant when the other 3 dimensions are changing.
For example; if I was walking down the road and every single
particle (including energy-mass and just everything) stopped moving and then
started moving again how would we know any difference?
We wouldn’t is the answer.
This made me think that perhaps it has happened; perhaps the
world does stop in its tracks and then start again.
Now (this is getting really deep) , if we imagine that for
every time it stops and starts is a separate part of time and that that part of
time has a single set of dimensions for each “everything”. We call each of
these points a “Time Singularity” and can be thought of much the same way as a
picture; but more like a 3d picture with your own senses involved (see thoughts
about consciousness). Each point of singularity may pass at any given time and
it wouldn’t matter when; it is only that the “time singularity” passes on to
the next that is important.
This ideal points to a world in which our own universe is
just a continuous set of 3d frames which we experience through our senses; and
rather than time being a 4th dimension; it is just an affect of the
other 3.
After reading this again today I am not sure whether it fits
together with the more complex ideals of quantum mechanics and more
specifically the uncertainty principle – however I am not sure whether the idea
that we cannot record where particles are succinctly has any real relevance to
my point.
If I come up with a better theory then I will amend this one
in line with the uncertainty principle.
No comments:
Post a Comment